The Smart Marty Sky Dispatch

Worldwide AviationSmartMarty.ca
Airline and Aircraft

‘Not Served In Exit Rows’: United Passenger Refused A Drink Gets 5,000 Miles

A passenger was wrongfully told they wouldn't be allowed to drink alcohol in the exit row, and has received small compensation.

‘Not Served In Exit Rows’: United Passenger Refused A Drink Gets 5,000 Miles
Featured aviation image for this report.

A United Airlines flight departing from Newark Liberty International Airport staged a hijack-alert incident after a passenger claimed to have a bomb and attempted to storm the cockpit. The event prompted the flight crew to issue the hijack alert during the journey, according to the compilation of coverage from the New York Post. The available material does not specify the exact flight number, destination, or aircraft type, but emphasizes that the security threat triggered an in-flight alert from the pilots and that the aircraft subsequently landed safely at its destination.

According to Simple Flying, the Newark-to-New Orleans routing is the version described in their reporting, with ACARS messaging reportedly used to alert other United departures about the threat as the situation unfolded. The aircraft is described as having landed safely at Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY), with the narrative noting that there were no reported injuries or detailed actions taken beyond the safe landing and the absence of disclosed information about the passenger involved or the nature of the threat.

WDSU’s account adds that the coverage uses language likening the threat to a Frontier Airlines incident at Ontario International Airport, but confirms that in the United case the core elements remain a hijack alert and a safe landing in New Orleans, without reporting injuries or terminal evacuations connected to the United incident. WDSU reiterates that deplaning information beyond the landing has not been disclosed in their material.

WWLTV.com’s synthesis mirrors the same core sequence: a United Airlines flight triggers a hijack alert after a bomb-claim, followed by a secure arrival at the destination. The outlet notes that other outlets describe related but separate security incidents on different flights (including the Ontario incident) and cautions that the material does not provide details tying those Ontario events directly to the MSY flight. No injuries or on-board events are described in their report specific to the United incident.

New York Post coverage emphasizes preliminary security elements, including the hijack alert and the decision to land at MSY after the threat was perceived, with the article compiling details from multiple outlets. The reports do not provide specifics about the flight number, aircraft type, or precise actions taken beyond the alert and the safe landing, according to the aggregation of reporting referenced.

Hoodline, drawing from CBS News and others, describes the Ontario incident separately as a Frontier Airlines flight at Ontario International Airport where a passenger overheard a FaceTime conversation containing words associated with bombs during a gaming session, leading to an evacuation and a security sweep. Hoodline clearly states this Ontario incident involved no injuries and no explosive device found, and that it is not directly tied to the United MSY flight.

Read the original source

Share this aviation story

Back to aviation news